Friday, November 20, 2009

The Rwandan Genocide




Yesterday in class, we debated the topic of the Rwandan Genocide. Jackie and I worked together as the Rwandan Armed Forces, Rwanda’s National Army. We worked hard to research our topic, but we still were a bit confused. For me, this topic was personally challenging because I don’t understand who the bad group is. I kept getting the names “Hutu” and “Tutsi” mixed up. In different articles, each stated that the opposite group of who I thought was at fault for killing all the people. Once I started researching this topic, it started to make more sense to me. During the research I did on FAR, I learned that it was made up of Hutus. It was interesting because during this debate, the Rwandan Armed Forces name was never brought up in conversation. This means that neither Jackie nor I had to defend the FAR. I was almost glad the the FAR's name wasn't brought up because I feel like I wouldn't have been able to confidently state the facts of the FAR. Now I feel like I know the facts well enough to defend the FAR if we had another debate.
My group, the Rwandan Armed Forces, had very little role in the genocide except for the fact that we killed the Tutsi rebels. The FAR, is a group of Hutus that were trained by the French. The rwandan armed forces were led by Juvenal Habyarimana until his plane was shot down by the Tutsis. The Tutsis are led by Paul Kigame. Kigame says that he wasn't responsible for shooting down Habyarimana and his plane. Although he says this, I strongly disagree. I believe that he was the one who shot it down. I was glad to hear that the French Court accused Kigame of killing Habyarimana. The French judge, Jean-Louis Bruguiere, was the one who accused Kigame of “ordering to shooting down the plane, which contributed to triggering the 1994 ethnic massacres and genocide.” The United States and Britain supported Kigame. (Paul Kigame accused by the French Court, globalreasearch.ca) I think that the US is also at fault during the genocide. I think they should've came to Rwanda's need when they knew the terrible things that were happening. The US and the UN both could've helped Rwanda by donating military supplies and providing food for the displaced Rwandans. Instead of helping, they sort of just watched from the side lines waiting for the genocide to be over. I think that if they would have stepped in, a lot of lives could have been saved. The Rwandan Armed Forces did their best to protect the people of Rwanda.


Friday, November 6, 2009

The American Scholar


Emerson’s argument in “The American Scholar” about American society still doesn’t hold true today because individuals are not just identified as their job, but by their other skills as well.

An individual may go into college and choose a career in something such as a lawyer. This individual may be a lawyer during the week but when the court session is closed, the lawyer doen't have to worry about the stress of a challenging case. On the weekend, this same lawyer could also be a handy man, and a father. Emerson is saying in “The American Scholar” that this is not possible. In our society, it is very common for an adult to work 2 jobs or hold a job as well as being a parent.

In Emerson’s time, teaching was less demanding. Anyone who had a certificate could teach a class. Today in modern times, an individual must have several different skills in order to be one teacher. “Just as the hand is divided into fingers, the better to answer its end.” This quote from "The American Scholar" tells us how we might think we are one job (the hand) but in order to do this job right we have to know several things (fingers). We must continue to find the balance to be able to work more then one job.